科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 98-107.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

获取创新衍生价值:企业内部知识-合作网络动态视角

黄灿1,徐戈1,沈慧君2,3   

  1. 1.浙江大学管理学院知识产权管理研究所,浙江 杭州310058;
    2.浙江工业大学管理学院,浙江 杭州310014;
    3.西交利物浦大学国际商学院,江苏 苏州215123

  • 收稿日期:2022-09-21 修回日期:2022-12-05 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-02-16
  • 通讯作者: 沈慧君
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目:“校企技术许可情境中企业衍生占有性研究:基于‘技术-主体’的分析框架”(72202214);国家自然科学基金面上项目:“基于专利交易数据的中国高校和科研院所技术转移的机制和政策分析”(71874152);国家社会科学基金重点项目:“聚焦关键核心技术突破的企业技术创新能力提升研究”(21AZD010)。

The capture of the generative value of innovation: A study based on the dynamic perspective of the internal knowledge and collaboration network of enterprise

Huang Can1, Xu Ge1, Shen Huijun2,3   

  1. 1.Institute for Intellectual Property Management, School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China;
    2. School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China;
    3. International Business School, Xi′an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2022-09-21 Revised:2022-12-05 Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-02-16
  • Contact: Huijun Shen

摘要: 技术环境动荡性增加、技术迭代周期缩短的背景下,如何持续不断从创新中获益成为企业面临的重大挑战。技术创新成果一方面具备为企业带来经济收益的原生价值,同时也具备作为未来创新的知识基础激发后续技术创新的“衍生价值”。本文认为,持续从创新中获益的关键在于获取技术的衍生价值。结合创新获利理论与企业内部网络视角,本文探究企业内部知识网络与合作网络动态性对企业获取技术衍生价值的影响。基于我国制药领域企业数据的实证结果表明:企业内部知识网络动态性与内部合作网络动态性均有助于企业获取自身技术创新成果的衍生价值,但在企业组织间研发网络中心度高的情况下,这种积极作用被削弱。通过动态调整内部网络结构,企业能够更好地应对技术环境的快速变化,持续从创新中获利。

关键词: 创新获利, 价值独占, 衍生占有性, 知识网络, 合作网络

Abstract:    With shortened technological lifecycle and rapid technological change, it is a major challenge for firms to continuously benefit from innovation. Technological inventions not only have an intrinsic value as solutions to specific technical problems, but also create generative value as the knowledge base and springboard for future technological inventions. Many existing studies focus on the primary appropriability to obtain revenues from technological inventions by incorporating them into products and licensing them in the market for technology. However, to continuously benefit from innovation, firms must also consider how to enhance generative appropriability, i.e., enhance the effectiveness of capturing greatest share of value from existing inventions by spawning from these existing technologies to generate future inventions. On the one hand, firms should promote sequential inventions and prevent their inventions from being imitated and exploited by competitors to sustain their competitive advantages. On the other hand, building on prior inventions would help firms to obtain subsequent products with improved performance, create higher commercial prospects than the original ones, and capture more revenue from their prior innovation efforts. Thus, enhancing generative appropriability is vital for firms to continuously benefit from innovation and sustain competitive advantage. Most existing literature focuses on primary appropriability. However, studies on generative appropriability remain relatively few. How to capture the generative value of inventions and continuously benefit from innovation is still under-explored. While primary appropriability emphasizes the effectiveness of achieving profits from innovation by commercializing inventions, generative appropriability highlights the importance of capturing value from subsequent technologies spawned by a firm′s existing technologies. There are still some theoretical gaps to be filled. First, prior literature indicates that appropriability mechanisms such as intellectual property regimes, trade secrets and complementary assets help protect and commercialize inventions to enhance primary appropriability. The effectiveness and potential roles of other types of informal appropriability mechanisms, such as internal networks, has yet to be thoroughly analyzed. To enhance generative appropriability, firms may need to dynamically change the structure of their internal knowledge network and collaboration network to promote sequential innovation and prevent imitation from competitors. Second, although prior literature has extensively investigated the impact of internal networks on innovation performance, relatively few studies have examined how internal network influence value capture, especially the dynamics of internal networks.To address these gaps, this study integrates profiting from innovation framework and internal network perspective to examine the impact of the dynamics of a firm′s internal knowledge network and collaboration network on generative appropriability. We argue that internal knowledge network dynamics, which promote knowledge recombination and sequential innovation and form imitation barriers, will lead to higher generative appropriability. Internal collaboration network dynamics also enhance generative appropriability by facilitating learning among inventors to effectively exploit existing technology, as well as by intensifying social complexity and increasing the imitation cost of competitors. In addition, the two positive relationships are weakened when the firm′s inter-organizational R&D network centrality is high due to frequent knowledge outflow and inter-organization interactions.We conduct an empirical analysis using a panel dataset of 965 Chinese pharmaceutical companies from 2005 to 2020. Results based on the panel data fixed effects model show that both the dynamics of the internal knowledge network and collaboration network help firms to capture the generative value of their technological inventions, but this positive effect is weakened when the inter-organizational R&D network centrality of firms is high. The results show that by dynamically adjusting the internal network structure, firms can better adapt to the rapid changes in the technological environment and continuously profit from innovation. This paper′s contributions are twofold. First, this paper enriches the studies on profiting from innovation by identifying internal knowledge network and collaboration network dynamics as the antecedents of generative appropriability. Secondly, this paper extends the studies on internal networks. By differentiating the mechanisms of internal knowledge network and collaboration network dynamics on generative appropriability, our study also provides empirical evidence that internal networks work effectively not only as a way for value creation but also for value appropriation. 

Key words: profit from innovation, value appropriability, generative appropriability, knowledge network, collaboration network