企业网络能力、创新结构与复杂产品系统创新关系研究

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1-8.

• 论文 • 下一篇

企业网络能力、创新结构与复杂产品系统创新关系研究

冉龙^1,2, 陈劲³, 董富全³

1. 浙江大学管理学院, 浙江杭州 310027;
2. 杭州市地铁集团有限责任公司, 浙江杭州 310020;
3. 浙江大学公共管理学院, 浙江杭州 310027

收稿日期:2012-04-05 修回日期:2013-06-05 出版日期:2013-08-27 发布日期:2013-08-15
作者简介:冉龙(1981-),男(汉),贵州湄潭人,浙江大学管理学院(博士生),研究方向:技术创新,创新管理。
陈劲(1969-),男(汉),浙江余姚人,浙江大学公共管理学院(教授、博士生导师),研究方向:创新管理,技术创新。
董富全(1975-),男(汉),山东商河人,浙江大学公共管理学院(博士生),研究方向:服务业创新,知识管理。

Study on relationship between enterprise network ability,innovation structure and complex product system innovation

Ran Long^1,2, Chen Jin³, Dong Fuquan³

1. School of management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;
2. Hangzhou Metro Group Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310020, China;
3. School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Received:2012-04-05 Revised:2013-06-05 Online:2013-08-27 Published:2013-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着我国基础设施的持续投资以及现代工业体系的建设推进,复杂产品的系统创新问题已经成为政府和理论界所共同关注的话题。本文以案例研究作为主要方法,对浦镇公司1949年至2012年的创新过程进行研究,主要结论如下:复杂产品系统创新通过企业网络能力、创新结构和创新模式共同协同演化而成,并在这个过程中呈现出自组织行为的阶段性特征,即:(1)涨落阶段:系统企业通过网络能力形成了有利于利用式创新模式的结构;(2)役使阶段:系统企业通过网络能力形成了有利于探索式创新模式的结构;(3)相变阶段:系统企业通过网络能力形成了利用式创新和探索式创新协同的结构。

关键词: 复杂产品系统创新, 网络能力, 创新结构

Abstract: With the increase of China's infrastructure investment and the advance of modern industrial system, the innovation of the complex product system has attracted great attention from both the Chinese Government and the academia. By selecting Puzhen Company as the subject of research on the innovation process spanning from 1949 to 2012, this paper obtains the following conclusions:the innovation of the complex product system co-evolves from the enterprise network ability, innovation structure and innovation mode of such system and shows the multi-phase characteristics of self-organization, namely:(1) in the fluctuation stage:the system enterprise forms the structure conducive to the exploitative innovation mode by means of the network ability; (2) in the slaving stage:the system enterprise forms the structure conducive to the exploratory innovation mode by means of the network ability; (3) in the phase transition stage:the system enterprise forms the co-structure, both exploitative and exploratory, by means of the network ability.

Key words: the system innovation of complex products, the network ability, the innovation structure

中图分类号:

F272.3

冉龙, 陈劲, 董富全. 企业网络能力、创新结构与复杂产品系统创新关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(8): 1-8.

Ran Long, Chen Jin, Dong Fuquan. Study on relationship between enterprise network ability,innovation structure and complex product system innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(8): 1-8.

参考文献

[1] Miller R, Hobday M, Demers T. L, Olleros X. Innovation in Complex Systems Industries:the Case of Flight Simulation [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change. 1995, 4(2):363-400. [2] Hobday M. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization [J]. Research policy 1998, 26:689-710. [3] Hansen K. I., Rush H. Hotspots in Complex Product and Systems Emerging Issues in Innovation Management [J]. Technovation 1998,18 (9):555-561. [4] Hobday M. The project-based organization:an ideal form for managing complex products and systems[J], Research Policy, 2000, 29:871-893. [5] Mike H. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization [J]. Research policy 1998, 26:689-710. [6] Hansen K. I, Rush H. Hotspots in Complex Product and Systems Emerging Issues in Innovation Management [J]. Technovation 1998,18 (9):555-561. [7] Brady T.Tools,Management 0f Innovation and Complex Product Systems.Working Paper prepared for CENTRIM/SPRU Project on Complex Product Systems/EPSRC Technology Management Initiative, 1995, 110-115. [8] 盛亚,尹宝兴. 复杂产品系统创新的利益相关者作用机理:ERP为例[J]. 科学学研究,2009(1):154-160. [9] 陈劲,周子范,周永庆.复杂产品系统创新的过程模型研究[J]. 科学学研究,2005(3):61-67. [10] Kash D.E, Rycoft R.W. Patterns of Innovating Complex Technologies:A Framework for Adaptive Network Strategies [J]. Research Policy, 2000 (29):820-831. [11] Gann D.M., Salter A. J. Innovation in Project-based, Service-enhanced Firms:The Construction of Complex Products and Systems [J]. Research Policy, 2000(29):955-972. [12] Mike H. The Project-based Organization:an Ideal Form for Managing Complex Products and Systems [J] Research Policy, 2000(29):871-893. [13] 童亮,陈劲. 复杂产品系统创新过程中跨组织知识管理的障碍因素[J]. 管理学报,2007(3):204-210. [14] Dosi G. Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories:A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change [J]. Research Policy. 1982, 1163:147-162. [15] Benner M.J., Tushman M. Process Management and Technological Innovation:A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2002, 10(47):676-707. [16] He Z, Wang P. Exploration vs. Exploitation:An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis [J]. Organization Science,2004(15):481-494. [17] March, J. G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J]. Organization Science, 1991(2):71-87. [18] Levinthal D.A, March J.G. The Myopia of Learning [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993(14):95-112. [19] Hardstone G. A. Capabilities, Structures and Strategies Re-examined:Incumbent Firms and the Emergence of Complex Product Systems in Mature Industries, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2009,(2):173-196. [20] Moller K. K., Halinen A. Business Relationships and Networks:Managerial Challenge of Network of Network Era [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 1999, 28(5):413-427. [21] Ritter T. The Networking Company:Antecedents for Coping with Relationships and Networks Effectively [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 1999, 28:467-479. [22] Salman N., Saives A.L. Indirect Networks:an Intangible Resource for Biotechnology Innovation [J]. R & D Management, 2005, 35(2):203-215. [23] 陈劲,刘振. 开放式创新模式下技术超学习对创新绩效的影响 [J]. 管理工程学报, 2011, 4(25):1-7. [24] Banner, Mary and Michael L. Tushman. Process Management and Technological Innovation:a Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2002, 47:676-706. [25] Sahal, D. Technological Guideposts and Innovation Avenues [J]. Research Policy, 1985, 14(2):61-82. [26] Yin R., K. Case Study Research:Design and Methods(3^rd ed.) [M], Sage Publications, Inc, 2003. [27] 吴金希, 于永达. 浅议管理学中的案例研究方法—特点、方法设计与有效性讨论[J]. 科学学研究, 2004, 12(22):105-110. [28] Tellis J. G., Stefan S., Yin E. The International Takeoff of New Products:the Role of Economics, Culture, and Country Innovativeness [J]. Marketing Science, 2003, 2(22):188-208. [29] Gilsing V., Nooteboom B. Density and Strength of Ties Innovation Networks:an Analysis of Multimedia and Biotechnology [J]. European Management Review. 2005, 2:179-197. [30] Baum J. C., Calabrese T., Silverman B.S. Don't Go It Alone:Alliance Network Composition and Startups's Performance in Canadian Biotechnology [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000 21:267-294 [31] Hansen M. T. The Search-Technological Development:A Network Approach [M]. Croom Helm, London, 1987. [32] Dyer J.H., Nobeoka K. Creating and Managing a High Performance Knowledge sharing Network:The TOYOTA Case [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21:345-67. [33] Levin D. Z., Cross R. The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust:The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer [J]. Management Science, 2004, 50:1477-1490. [34] Ritter T., Gem nden H.G. The Impact of a Company's Business Strategy on Its Technological Competence, Network Competence and Innovation Success. Journal of Business Research, 2004, 57(5):548-556. [35] Ritter T. Wilkinson I.F., Johnston W.J. Measuring network competence:Some international evidence. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. 2002,17(3):119-138.

企业网络能力、创新结构与复杂产品系统创新关系研究

Study on relationship between enterprise network ability,innovation structure and complex product system innovation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴航陈劲. 网络伙伴多样化的影响因素与创新情景[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 137-143.
[2]	王黎萤, 吴瑛, 朱子钦, 宋秀玲. 专利合作网络影响科技型中小企业创新绩效的机理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(1): 57-66.
[3]	张璐,侯雪茹,王科唯，张强，贾依帛. 跨越关系无效的壁垒：企业网络位置动态构建机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(6): 245-255.
[4]	屠兴勇,赵紫薇,王泽英. 渐进式创新绩效的影响因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(8): 72-79.
[5]	李飞星胡振华. 农业企业网络能力影响因素及其机理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(12): 141-151.
[6]	马柯航. 虚拟整合网络能力对创新绩效的作用机制研究—知识资源获取的中介作用[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(8): 60-67.
[7]	刘兰剑. 网络能力、网络地位与创新绩效—产业控制力来源的另一个视角[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(12): 17-25.
[8]	范钧, 郭立强, 聂津君. 网络能力、组织隐性知识获取与突破性创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(1): 16-24.
[9]	周江华, 刘宏程, 仝允桓. 企业网络能力影响创新绩效的路径分析[J]. 科研管理, 2013, (6): 58-67.
[10]	李随成, 李勃, 张延涛. 供应商创新性、网络能力对制造企业产品创新的影响—供应商网络结构的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(11): 103-113.
[11]	韵江, 马文甲, 陈丽. 开放度与网络能力对创新绩效的交互影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(7): 8-15.
[12]	王国顺, 杨帆. 创业导向、网络能力对国际化绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(10): 144-150.