基于专利分析的LED企业竞合关系研究

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (7): 78-86.

基于专利分析的LED企业竞合关系研究

袁晓东, 陈静

华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2011-08-09 修回日期:2012-03-28 出版日期:2013-07-27 发布日期:2013-07-23
作者简介:袁晓东(1973-),男,湖北襄阳人,华中科技大学管理学院知识产权系教授,研究方向:知识产权与技术创新。
陈静(1989-),女,江西吉安人,华中科技大学管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向:知识产权管理与技术创新。
基金资助:
教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"LED产业专利分散度测量及专利战略选择研究"(批准号:11YJA630188)起止时间2011.9-2014.4。

The co-opetition relationship of LED manufacturers based on patent information analysis

Yuan Xiaodong, Chen Jing

School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2011-08-09 Revised:2012-03-28 Online:2013-07-27 Published:2013-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Nichia、Toyoda Gosei、Cree、Osram和Philips五大国际厂商代表了当今 LED 的最高水平,其发展动态对产业具有重大的影响。LED行业专利集中度日益降低,五大厂商呈现竞争与合作关系。五大厂商之间技术资源的异质性及相互依赖性所导致的技术优势互补是竞合关系形成的前提。我国LED生产企业应争取进入五大厂商交叉授权关系网,应构建紧密的互赖合作网络,以合作网络形成的集体力量提高对于市场的掌控与应变能力。

关键词: LED, 五大厂商, 竞合关系, 交叉授权

Abstract: Nichia, Toyoda Gosei, Cree, Osram, and Philips represent the highest level of LED, their development trends have a significant impact on the industry. Patent concentration of LED industry becomes increasingly lower. Therefore, the relationships among five manufacturers are changed into a co-opetition relation which is win-win situation for them. The heterogeneity and interdependence of technical resources for the top five manufacturers have led to technology complementary, which is the prerequisite of co-opetition formation. Chinese LED manufacturers should access the cross-licensing relationships of the top five vendors. Moreover, a closed interdependence co-operation network should be built in order to improve the capability of market control and resilience.

Key words: LED, five manufacturers, co-opetition relation, cross-licensing

中图分类号:

G306

袁晓东, 陈静. 基于专利分析的LED企业竞合关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, (7): 78-86.

Yuan Xiaodong, Chen Jing. The co-opetition relationship of LED manufacturers based on patent information analysis[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, (7): 78-86.

参考文献

[1] 邱晶晶. LED厂商之竞争策略分析-以Cree公司为例.台湾:台湾国立政治大学硕士学位论文, 2008:8-18. [2] K.K. Lai, F.P. Su, C.S. Weng, et al. A study of co-opetition strategy from the patent analysis perspective: the case of manufacturers in the stent market [J]. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manage, 2007,4: 137-153. [3] Brandenburger A M, Nalebuff B J. Co-opetition: A Revolution Mindset that Combines Competition and Cooperation: The Game Theory Strategy that’s Changing the Game of Business [M].New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc, 1996. [4] Jorde T M,Teece D J. Competition and cooperation: Striking the right balance [J]. California Management Review,1989,31(1):25-37. [5] Padula G, Dagnino G B. Untangling the rise of coopetition: The intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure [J]. International Studies of Management and Organization, 2007, 37(1):32-53. [6] Bengtsson M, Kock S. Cooperation and competition in relationships between competitors in business networks [J]. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,1999,14(2):178-193. [7] Kürtossy J. Innovation indicators derived from patent data [J]. Manage.Sci., 2004,12(1):91-101. [8] A.F. Breitzman and M.E. Mogee. The many applications of patent analysis [J]. Journal of Information Science, 2002(28):187-206. [9] Ernst H. The use of patent for technological forecasting: The diffusion of CNC- Technology in the machine tool industry [J]. Small Bus.Econ,1997,9:361-381. [10] Ernst H. Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning [J]. Res.Policy,1998,9:361-381. [11] Narin F, E Noma. Patent as Indicators of Corporate Technological Strength [J]. Research Policy, 1987(16):143-155. [12] Breitzman A,P Thomas,M Cheney. Technological powerhouse or diluted competence: techniques for assessing mergers via patent analysis [J]. R&D Manage., 2002,32(1):1-10. [13] Breitzman A,P Thomas. Using patent citation analysis to target/value M&A Candidates [J]. Res.Technol.Manag., 2002,45(5):28-36. [14] Kuei-Kuei Lai,Fang-Pei Su,Weng C.S. Chiau-Ling Chen,Mei-Lan Lin. A Study of Co-Opetition Strategy from the Patent Analysis Perspective: The Case of Manufacturers in the Stent Market [J]. Technology Management for the Global Future, 2006(7):137-153. [15] Cockburn I, MacGarvie M, Mueller E. Patent thickets, licensing and innovative performance [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2010,19(3):899-926. [16] Von Graevenitz G,Wagner S,Harhoff D. How to measure patent thickets-a novel approach [J]. Economics Letters,2011,111:6-9. [17] Agrawal R,Imilienski T,Swami A. Mining Association Rules between Sets of Items in Large Databases [J]. Proc.Of the ACM SIGMOD Int’l Conf.On Management of Data, 1993:207-216. [18] Schmoch U. Evaluation of technology strategies of companies by means of MDS maps [J]. International Journal of Technology Management,1995,10:426-427. [19] Ming-Yeu Wang,Tzu-Fu Chiu,Wei-Ying Chen. Exploring Potential R&D Collaborators Based on Patent Portfolio Analysis:PICMET 2009 Proceedings, August 2-6,2009 [C]. Portland,2009:322-330. [20] Teece D,Pisano G,Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997,18(7):509-533.