国际技术扩散:基于TFP的多渠道外溢分析

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (10): 17-25.

国际技术扩散:基于TFP的多渠道外溢分析

张化尧, 王赐玉

浙江工业大学经贸管理学院, 浙江杭州 310032

收稿日期:2011-03-03 修回日期:2011-10-11 出版日期:2012-10-27 发布日期:2012-10-22
基金资助:
本文受到国家自然科学基金"面向外溢阻断策略的全球制造网络中本土后向联系企业的能力升级研究"(71072164)、"跨国创业导向与国际化绩效:影响机理和实证研究"(71173195)、"母子公司知识异质性、协同创新行为与创新绩效研究"(71072162)。浙江省自然科学基金"基于GPN的外向型中小企业能力升级研究"(Y6110571),教育部人文社科基金"新兴经济在生产全球化中的纵向外外溢阻断机理与技术接入障碍"09YJA790185)及浙江工业大学人文社科研究基地项目"技术截断下的外向型企业技术能力升级研究"联合资助。

International technological diffusion: A multiple spillovers channels analysis based on TFP model

Zhang Huayao, Wang Ciyu

College of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China

Received:2011-03-03 Revised:2011-10-11 Online:2012-10-27 Published:2012-10-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着中国经济国际化的加深,国际技术扩散成为了近年来研究的热门话题,然而各研究结果存在着多种矛盾的解释,笔者认为这主要是由于对模型结构转化和外溢时滞等影响导致模型和现实脱离所致。本文用普遍被采用的全要素生产率(TFP)模型,对中国1985-2007年的进口、出口、FDI和对外直接投资四种外溢渠道配合相关统计数据进行了分析。分析的结果除显示国内研发投入和FDI对于技术的进步具有显著的促进作用之外,也发现在分析的早期阶段由于中国在国际贸易中的设备引进和国际生产环节向中国转移特色,导致国际贸易因素对TFP的影响作用向国内研发转移,从而使前者表现为不显著而后者的影响作用被夸大,本文的结果还显示,现阶段对外投资的逆向知识获取效应不明显是效率损失的结果,而不能说明理论的失效。

关键词: TFP, 国际技术扩散, 国际贸易, FDI, 对外直接投资

Abstract: With the deepening of Chinese economics’ internationalization, international technological diffuse has become a hot topic. There are various contradict explanations for different research results. The structure change of model and delay from spillovers lead to that the model separates from practice. The common used Total Factor Productivity (TFP) model is applied to inspect the spillover effects of Chinese import, export, FDI, and Outward-Foreign Direct Investment(OFD) on TFP during a time span from the year of 1985 to 2007. The results show that both domestic R&D investment and FDI have remarkable effects, consisting with the results of former researches. Besides, they also indicate how the structure change of model has led to the import effects that are difficult to explain, and how the delay effect of spillovers has led to indistinct export results. Furthermore, the unremarkable regression results of the inverse knowledge acquisition from abroad for OFDI are a result of efficiency lose, but are not the failure of the theory.

Key words: TFP, international technological spillover, international trade, FDI, OFDI

中图分类号:

F124.3

张化尧, 王赐玉. 国际技术扩散:基于TFP的多渠道外溢分析[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (10): 17-25.

Zhang Huayao, Wang Ciyu. International technological diffusion: A multiple spillovers channels analysis based on TFP model[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (10): 17-25.

参考文献

[1] Dunning, J. H. The economic theory of the firm as the basis for a ‘core’ theory of international production. Islam, I., Shepherd, W. Current Issues in International Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997. 60-68.
[2] Roberts, Edward B. Benchmarking global strategic management of technology[J]. Research Technology Management. 2001, 44(2): 25-36.
[3] Le Bas, C., Sierra, C. Location versus home country advantages in R&D activities: some further results on multinationals locational strategies[J]. Research Policy. 2002, 31(4): 978-992.
[4] Bo Carlsson. Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature[J]. Research Policy. 2006, 35(1): 56-67
[5] Ernst, D. Complexity and internationalization of innovation: why is chip design moving to Asia?[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management. 2005(1): 124-136.
[6] von Zedtwitz, M. International R&D Strategies in Companies from Developing Countres-the Case of China. UNCTAD, 2005.
[7] 王俭,李雪松.外商直接投资与中国出口关系的面板数据分析[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版).2005,4(1):1-5.
[8] 邵军,徐康宁.基于面板协整方法的外资与外贸关系研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究.2007(9):91-99.
[9] Kui-yin CHEUNG, Ping LIN. Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data[J]. China Economic Review. 2004, 15(1): 25- 44.
[10] Xiaohui Liu, Chenggang Wang. Does foreign direct investment facilitate technological progress? Evidence from Chinese industries[J]. Research Policy. 2003, 32(6): 945-953.
[11] Liu, X. H., Buck, T. Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries[J]. Research Policy, 2007. 36(2): 355-366.
[12] 刘舜佳.国际贸易、FDI和中国全要素生产率下降--基于1952~2006年面板数据的DEA和协整检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究.2008(11):28-55.
[13] 黄凌云,范艳霞,刘夏明.基于东道国吸收能力的FDI技术溢出效应[J].中国软科学.2007(3):30-34.
[14] 吴建军,仇怡.我国R&D存量对国际贸易技术扩散效应的影响研究[J].科学管理研究.2007,25(10):99-101.
[15] 黄凌云,范艳霞,许林.国际贸易与FDI的技术溢出[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版).2007,30(12):121- 131.
[16] 李平,宋丽丽.FDI渠道的R&D溢出、吸收能力与中国技术进步--基于一个扩展的LP方法的实证研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2009(4):25-31.
[17] Fosfuri, A., Motta, M., Ronde, T. Foreign direct investment and spillovers through worker’s mobility[J]. Journal of International Economics. 2001, 53(1): 205-222.
[18] Gorg Holger, David Greenaway. Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment?. World Bank research Observer. 2004, 19(2): 171-197.
[19] Ma A. C. Export Spillovers to Chinese Firms: Evidence from Provincial Data[J]. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies. 2006, 4(2): 127-149.
[20] Ernst, D., L. Kim. Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion, and Local Capability Formation[J]. Research Policy. 2002, 31(8-9): 14,17-29.
[21] Barbosa, N., V. Eiriz. Linking Corporate Productivity to Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Assessment[J]. International Business Review. 2009, 18(1): 1-13.
[22] Hatani, F. The Logic of Spillover Interception: The Impact of Global Supply Chains in China[J]. Journal of World Business. 2009, 44(2): 158-166.